
Throughout my blogging I’ve discussed all of the work that goes into a complete portfolio and my naivety toward the subject. Because I thought portfolios were simply websites I never explored nontraditional portfolios. Nontraditional portfolios have unique ways of displaying the designer’s work. “The most distinguishing feature is often an unusual exterior- a record box, film can, or vintage suitcase” (Page 140). However, some nontraditional portfolios have no container. Nontraditional portfolios run the gamut in terms of make, style and presentation. When it comes to designing a nontraditional portfolio it is important to make sure it fits with the designer. Being different just to be different isn’t the best approach. “The portfolio should match the work, and never overpower or upstage the design samples inside” (Page 140). The work presented in a nontraditional portfolio shouldn’t be radically different than the actual nontraditional portfolio. A theme could provide consistency between the portfolio and work.
One of the nontraditional portfolios that I found compelling was Nathan Zarse’s. He is a recent graduate of the Herron School of Arts and Designs. His nontraditional portfolio is a vintage suitcase. The suitcase is consistent with his interest in bringing back the design styles of the 1940s and 1950s (Page 150). Within the suitcase are ordinary manila envelopes. These manila envelopes are labeled with a distinctive sticker label he designed. In addition, he has an antique leatherette notebook that remains consistent with the vintage feel of his nontraditional portfolio (Page 150). I found this portfolio interesting because Zarse directly addressed the style of design he is interested in by choosing this nontraditional portfolio. I also found it appealing because of my own interest in vintage trunks and suitcases.
Pieces within a nontraditional can speak to art directors. “Any portfolio piece that takes a stand on an issue, or poses and then answers a question, helps an art director understand the person behind the work and their interests” (Page 151). People tend to work harder on things they are passionate about. If an art director knows you have an interest in sailing then he or she might want you to work on an upcoming project for a marina. As a designer I believe it is important to have opinions and be able to take a stand. If an art director sees that a person is dedicated to something than he or she might be more likely to hire them.
Websites are probably the best means of meeting a broad audience. They also give the opportunity for interested parties to survey a designer before deciding to meet with them. “A website is inclusive and anonymous; anyone with an Internet connection can visit a site without the designer or firm knowing who he or she is” (Page 162). Other portfolios are not as wide reaching. The designer is typically in control of who sees other means of portfolios. However, with websites someone could potentially be looking at it in another country and decide to offer you work. Additionally, websites are always available (Page 162). Their availability is not dependent on the designer sending out a copy or an art director asking for designers.
Portfolios are the best way for designers to display their work to potential employers. In particular nontraditional portfolios and websites can speak volumes about who a designer is. It is important infuse your personality into both all while remaining consistent with the work displayed in your portfolio.




